Town Hall
MINUTES
Approved
· CALL TO ORDER : Mayor Leggett: The following Town Council members were present: Mayor Leggett, Vice Mayor Lynch, Jerry Goebel, Alice Butler, Claudia Mitchell, Jean Goodine, and Jeff Benson. Town Attorney John Bennett and Town Clerk Laura Dodd were also present.
·
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
: Mayor Leggett asked the Council to consider the minutes of the Oct.13, 2004 continued on
· REPORTS :
Treasury Report , Mr. Goebel
· BANK SUMMARY REPORT: Mr. Goebel reviewed the attached bank summary report. The total consolidated assets of the Town’s accounts were $ 564,797.13.
· WATER USAGE: Mr. Goebel reported that the gallons pumped were 1,130.700, the backwash was 43,500 gallons, billable gallons were 1,087,200 gallons, and the gallons billed were 923,870 gallons. He also noted that the water revenue was $4,780.66 and the past due amount was $3,801.75 and the total assets of Washington Water Works for December were $10, 832.62.
· BILLS TO BE PAID: Mr. Goebel asked the Council to review the list of bills to be paid and the additional bills paid list and to consider an additional bill to be paid for $816.50 to John Bennett which had arrived late which brought the bills to be paid to $23,936.74.
Mr. Benson asked about the progress on the reservoir road
Mayor Leggett reported that less than half the road was done.
Mrs. Mitchell asked about the two bills from Mr. Critzer.
Mr. Goebel commented that the $6,856.06 bill was for Nov. and it had come in late and had been pre-approved and that the bill for $9,749.90 was for Dec. He said that the total for the road so far was $25,896.
Mayor Leggett said that Mr. Critzer had made a suggestion that members of the Council arrange to ride up the new reservoir road with either him or Mrs. Critzer and be shown what had been done.
Mr. Goebel commented that the $6,000 bill to the Treasurer of Virginia was for the Wastewater discharge permit.
Ms. Mitchell asked about the gallons treated but not billed amount saying it had jumped back up.
Mr. Goebel explained that he thought it was due to leaks but that it was about average for treated not billed.
Mr. Benson made a motion to accept the Treasurer’s Report and Ms. Goodine seconded and the motion passed 7-0 and the Treasurer’s Report was accepted.
· PLANNING COMMISSION : Chairman Gary Schwartz reported that the Planning Commission had met and that the meeting set for Jan. had nothing currently on the agenda. He said he had talked to Hank Day and Cheryl Shepherd and that they intended to provide a straw man draft of the Historic District Ordinance in February. He said he had spoken to Milton Herd and they were scheduled to do something regarding the Comprehensive Plan and he would advertise it in the paper.
· ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD : Mayor Leggett reported that the Council had received an agenda for the next ARB meeting but there was no report.
· TOWN ATTORNEY : Mr. Bennett reported that he had observations regarding the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the engineering considerations that the Council was to hear that evening but he would save them until he had heard Mr. White’s proposal.
· OLD BUSINESS : a). CHRISTMAS PARTY: Mayor Leggett thanked the following people for helping with the Christmas party: Ms. Clarissa Leggett, Chairman of the Organizing Committee, Ms. Veronika Benson for decorating the Town Hall door wreaths, Ms. Michelle Schwartz and Mike Morgan for decorating the street signs, Ms. Diane McPhearson, Town Hall decorating, Mr. Jerry Goebel, invitations and decorating, and Mr. Jeff Benson and Ms. Ann Critzer, decorating, everyone who brought food, and Rev. Hobson and Rev. Bailey, and Ms. Dodd. He commented that it was a great party and that everyone had enjoyed themselves.
· NEW BUSINESS : a). MR. METCALF’S WATER TAP REQUEST: Mayor Leggett commented that before they continued with Old Business he wanted to proceed to Mr. Metcalf’s water tap request (attached) so that Mr. Metcalf would not have to wait through the whole meeting.
Mayor Leggett commented that he thought the Council had all had a chance to look at Mr. Metcalf’s request and Mr. McCarthy’s comments. He asked if there was any discussion.
Ms. Goodine asked if Mr. Metcalf had seen the recommendations from Mr. McCarthy.
Ms. Dodd said that she had discussed them with him on the phone.
Ms. Mitchell asked if Mr. Metcalf had any comments on Mr. McCarthy’s comments on his request.
Mr. Metcalf said no and that he was looking for what comments the Council had in reference to those comments and that he was looking down the road to the Wastewater System and he wanted to know what the Council expected from the process.
Ms. Mitchell said that for her the Wastewater System was in such an infancy stage it was hard to figure out what was happening and would it be an issue for him if it did not happen right away and would there be a negative impact on him if it happened at a different time.
Mr. Metcalf discussed that he was looking for the Council to take it under consideration and that the residences were located on property that he would like to develop and that there were three lots and two residences that were not habitable.
Ms. Goodine commented that Mr. McCarthy had indicated that unless Mr. Metcalf intended to install his taps within one year Council would be well advised to decline to provide them and asked if he would provide them within one year.
Mr. Metcalf said yes and that he wanted to start the process and establish the right to two taps to two properties and then wait and see if in a few years the sewer system came on line and if not he would do something else.
Mr. Bennett asked if all the lots were out of town.
Mr. Metcalf said yes but they were next to the water line and that the adjoining lots had water. He said one property had perked for a septic system for a small residence and another would have to be evaluated.
Ms. Mitchell said that she would like to not make a decision one way or another and that the Council had Mr. Metcalf’s request entered and would fit it in as soon as it could once they knew what they were doing.
The Council agreed by consensus to table the request.
·
OLD BUSINESS: Continued:
b). WASTEWATER UPDATE AND WW & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING AND SURVEY FEE PROPOSAL FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM: Mayor Leggett reported that he had had a meeting with Tom Faha, Regional Director of DEQ for
He asked Mr. Lynch how many years it had been since they had first started.
Mr. Lynch commented that they had started in 1988 and so it had been sixteen years.
Mayor Leggett said that they were going faster then Sperryville had done and then he asked Mr. White to explain his proposal and said that engineering the wastewater system involved three big pieces: 1) the conveyance system, getting the stuff from the house to a treatment plant, 2) the treatment plant, and 3) the disbursement.
Mr. White said that the March permit from DEQ would be followed by potential public hearings and the whole process could take eight to ten months. He said that they might recall from the Preliminary Engineering Report that WW & Associates had recommended a grinder pump low pressure piping system within the town to convey it to a treatment plant wherever that might be and wherever the final disposal site was and they had concluded that was the selected alternative for the conveyance system and the proposal before the Council that night was to proceed with the engineering of that element of it understanding that design was independent of where the ultimate disposal site for treatment was. He said that there would be a series of pressure pipes through Town in the streets and collection pumps into lots which needed to be engineered.
He discussed a drawing from the PER which showed green lines for the pipes in the streets which needed to be engineered and the lines in red were where the pumps at the houses were coming to the streets and that basically all that had to be engineered and surveyed, and also the collection pumps into the lots had to be engineered.
He said that he walked the streets that day to start getting some ideas and he had looked at Sperryville and had seen how they did it with their septic tanks so where the septic tank was was where the pump was, maybe behind the house. He said that since this was to be a public sewer and public pumps they would like to follow the lot lines and basically each lot would have to be studied to figure out where to put it.
Mr. White said that it was clear that when they engineered this that there were several things they needed to do including: public notification that they needed to do the surveys on the lots; a public meeting to get public input as certain individuals would like pump stations in certain locations for certain reasons and that within reason they could work with that and there would be some give and take with the public to accommodate them and it was part of their proposal to do that; and then to go ahead an proceed with the design of that piping grid within town limits; and then submit it to the State for review.
He said that when the treatment element and disposal element was decided that generally worked out to be a different type of contractor so there should be two different sets of construction documents, one for the piping and one for the plant.
Mayor Leggett asked if the collection lay out would be different if the Town should choose a disbursal point on a different piece of property.
Mr. White said it would not be and the collection lay out needed mains in the streets and pumps behind the houses or at a low point of the lot and needed to pump to the street and whether the main in the street pumped to Sperryville or pumped to the Clopton property or wherever the grid was the same.
Ms. Mitchell asked if Mr. Metcalf’s house and Oden and Piedmont Sts. outside of town were on the plan.
Mr. White said he had included lots outside of town but he needed to ask the Town that question.
Mr. Bennett commented that legally the Town could not extend the sewer line outside of the town without the permission of the County.
Ms. Mitchell asked if they had water if that changed that.
Mr. Bennett said they could send water but not the sewer lines.
Mayor Leggett asked if the Town was to have a policy to extend sewer rights to anyone the Town was providing water to would that be legal.
Mr. Bennett said it would have to be approved by the County.
Mr. White commented that it came out at the meeting that if the treatment plant was located in the County it would also require approval by the County.
Ms. Mitchell asked if the Supervisors would have to vote on it.
Mr. White yes they would but that DEQ would proceed with the application without that signature.
Ms. Mitchell discussed if when Mr. White engineered the plan was his intent to move utilities such as fiber optics, cable, electric, etc… underground.
Mr. White said his intent when he surveyed was to physically locate those utilities so that they could engineer around them and not disturb those utilities. He said they needed to know where they were so they did not interfere with fiber optic lines.
Ms. Mitchell asked if when he had done this in other communities if he had ever integrated his engineering plans to include moving those things underground at the same time.
Mr. White said he had when they had had to but that the particular piping was small three inch pipes under pressure not dependent on location and it could be routed around existing utilities.
Ms. Mitchell said she was talking about moving existing utilities underground.
Mr. White said that if there were utilities that needed to be moved they could do that and that it appeared that the majority of the utilities were overhead.
Mr. Bennett commented that something that had to be talked about on an on going basis was the interplay between the wastewater collection system, discharge, and overall sewage system and the Comprehensive Plan and existing Zoning Ordinance of the Town and that what the existing zoning talked about was that there might be two lots that could not get built on because they could not get a drainfield however if a sewer line was touching the property, there could be a legal right to build on those existing lots because if they have a 5 acre property that that had 1/2 acre village zoning it had theoretically ten potential lots if the sewer line was touching it. He said that what the Council had discussed at times in the past was looking at various approaches or phases or whatever, one of which was to start with the town center first or perhaps identify an area most in need. He said that this proposal considers not only the town center but surveying lines for lateral streets whish was a huge issue from a comprehensive planning perspective and a zoning issue. He said that was why he was bring it up then and perhaps the Council wanted to look at the interplay between some of those issues and make some preliminary decisions as to the collection system’s extension into areas of the town and possibly extending into the County. He said that the Council might want to refer back to the Planning Commission to look at it in regards to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances. He said that he thought that this particular subject had bigger implications and they might not want to be spending money on thing they might not want to.
Mayor Leggett asked if he was saying that the Council might not want the grid that was being proposed.
Mr. Bennett said that what he was trying to convey was that the Council and Town had to get some kind of sense of where it was going with the collection system and were they trying to serve every street in the Town or should they serve first the areas with failing systems.
Mayor Leggett said they did not know which were the failing systems and if any were failing underneath and not showing it and they could rule that out. He said that the other question in his mind was whether anyone getting water should get sewer.
Mr. Bennett discussed that water ran through all the lateral streets and if sewer lines were to run through there then all that ground that had potentially big pieces of property with one house with ten acres on the outskirts of town by zoning could use by right use that line so that instead of one house and drainfield on ten acres then with one acre zoning there could now be ten houses.
Mr. Leggett asked if he was saying if someone had ten acres they could not get a sewer line.
Mr. Bennett said he wasn’t saying that but that first that the Town should start to look at all these issues in a concrete way. He said that he wasn’t trying to give the answers but raise the issues.
Ms Mitchell said that had been discussed before and it was urgent to rewrite the Comprehensive Plan with Milton Herd.
Mr. Bennett discussed that it meant that the location of the collection lines was not just purely an engineering exercise but a huge planning exercise also.
Ms. Mitchell commented that the location of the collection lines was only going in the roads of the town and that to engineer there and to protect with other comprehensive plan aspects could happen at the same time and that the engineering did not have to wait until the other was finished.
Mr. White commented that nor did anything happen until it was built and he discussed that the central focus of the PER was to provide sewer service to approximately 200 homes and businesses within the Town and if they only did half of them the financial aspects would be endangered. He said that the project was a low to nominal growth project and was not engineered for any major expansion per parcel but was being engineered for what was here now with nominal capacity for growth.
Mr. Bennett said that the Council’s desire was one thing but because of legal constraints and what legally had to be done at the end of the day the capacity might be all used up before they a had accomplished what they had planned at the top of the list. He discussed that if you had to reserve capacity because of where the line was because of legal restraints what happened was inadvertently you knocked off what was important to you because you did not look at the issues. He discussed that it came back to whether to survey and study all the lateral streets for the initial collection system.
Ms. Mitchell said that was always a part of the plan.
Mayor Leggett asked what he meant by initial collection system and did he mean the number of houses that would not get service to the house.
Mr. Bennett said he was not clear on this but one way of looking at the whole thing was that was the engineering survey to provide sewer system to every street in town.
Mr. White said it was to provide a sewer system to the existing home on every street in the town and that there was very nominal growth capacity engineered for future homes.
Ms. Mitchell said she had always assumed that everybody in town would be on the system and the original plan had been in phases over many years and she thought that was because of financial restraints. She said that it never occurred to her that the whole town might not have sewer and that she thought the Town Council and the Planning Commission would protect the Town in the future by rewriting the Comprehensive Plan with the details being in the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Bennett commented that if that was the basis of the Council proceeding then the critical question that came before the Planning Commission and Council fairly soon was that if the lines were to run through to the outer edges of town and through acreage parcels what effect might there be. He said to plan a limited growth system on one hand and on the other planning a collection area with whole town involving all the lots usually caused a conflicting situation that needed to be resolved.
Ms. Mitchell asked how we would decide which people to exclude in town and that we would be more likely to be sued if the Town said a property was too big and was not going to be included. She said that she thought that the point was the town had a sewer problem, everybody did, and some more then others. She said it was still going to take several years and she would count on the mechanisms that were going to control the growth.
Mayor Leggett said that what they were talking about here was a research plan where they were researching what the obstacles were and what you really had to have to build the system but they were not going to be building the system yet.
Mr. White said it was not being built by this project.
Mayor Leggett said this was what they really needed to do because it would have to be done anyhow in a matter of time and he said he didn’t know how long it would take.
Mr. White said to have it engineered and have it approve would take about six months.
Ms. Goodine said that it was self evident that they would be on stronger ground by limiting and controlling growth via ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan then by arbitrarily deciding which was a lateral street and not providing a sewage system there and didn’t it make more sense to limit through ordinances.
Mr. Bennett said it was usually a combination of the location of the sewers and the ordinances.
Ms. Mitchell said that she thought it was more important that the Town speed up the process of the interaction of the Council with the Planning Commission with joint meetings.
Mr. Schwartz commented that he thought that the Planning Commission was aware of the balance and sensitivity between the number of water taps and the design of the wastewater system and that as far as the Comprehensive Plan went that was the tool that was needed to manage what the Town wanted to do and it was going to be a balance and what was known in the Comprehensive Plan now was one line that said that the Town needed to consider the wastewater system and there had to be more details and paragraphs which would lead to public hearings and public forums and possible changes in zoning that would accommodate what the Town needed to consider from the stand point of wastewater and volume and what citizens needed from lots and taps and residences and commercial businesses. He said he thought that was what the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances did and he believed that it would not be easy but they were aware of it and they would need everyone’s support to help balance it out and the way things were defined now might not be the way they would be defined with a wastewater system and what people had in mind was a perception of how it should be done and that was what the Planning Commission had to work with and what they were prepared to do.
Ms. Mitchell said she really like to have some early joint meetings.
Mr. Bennett said that if the timeline for the engineering was six months he did not think the Town could come near that with the Council having independent processes and that there should be joint meetings.
Mr. Schwartz said that they would double up meetings and if need be have more,
Ms. Mitchell expressed her concern that they needed to have official joint work sessions so they would be ready when Mr. White was ready with the engineering plan.
Mr. Schwartz said they could schedule joint meeting as often as was possible.
Mr. Bennett discussed that at the end of the day before the Council went forward with the engineering they really needed to resolve the Comprehensive Plan, development, and zoning issues.
Mr. White said that at the end of the day that they needed sewage in the streets of Washington engineered and said that he had earlier pointed out that the wastewater plant was a six to eight month permit process and that the lines could not be built before the process was finished and that they were just getting a quick start.
Mr. Bennett asked about what permitting process was required for the collection process.
Mr. White said it was not a permit process but a review and approval process by the State DEQ. He said that part of the proposal was to do aerial work in the spring before the leaves came out and if they delayed the proposal by several months they would miss the opportunity to do the work.
Mayor Leggett asked if there were anymore questions.
Mr. Lynch expressed his concerns that the Town might be liable if they kept anyone from building because of the capacity.
Ms. Mitchell said that 60,000 gallons a day was the design capacity.
Mr. White said that the proposed capacity was 80,000 gallons.
Ms. Mitchell said that there was room there for some growth.
Mr. White indicated that the numbers he had given were not good numbers.
Ms. Bruce expressed her concerns that many lots did not have regular occupants now and the Town should be considering how many gallons would be used if all the current homes were being used regularly plus the additional lots that could be developed especially around the bank building.
Ms. Mitzie Young also expressed her concern about all the lots that could be developed in the center of town around the bank building.
Mr. Bennett said that type of question needed to be looked at.
Ms. Mitchell said the Town had always known that and it was the Town’s responsibility now to update the Comprehensive Plan and redo zoning because we had to have a sewer system.
Mr. White said he wanted to qualify his numbers and that he had given some poor numbers and that the peak month according to the PER was Aug. of 2002 with 42,475 gallons a day monthly average and the design capacity was for 60,000 gallons a day.
Mr. Bennett said that another Comprehensive Plan issued that had always been discussed was that the system was going to be built so there could be expansion in commercial activity in the town center.
Ms. Mitchell said she had never heard anyone talk about it.
Mayor Leggett said that they were going into issues that would be dealt with in the Comprehensive Plan but right then the issue was could they go ahead with the engineering for the collection system and in the interest of doing some of the things in parallel so that they had something ready to go so it could be looked at with the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Mitchell asked if he was considering everyone could get together and make it happen.
Mr. Schwartz discussed how the Comprehensive Plan review process might need to be accelerated and that before Milton Herd even got there they might need more of his time to facilitate joint meetings to help answer land use questions related to planning and wastewater. He said that Mr. Herd’s time had to be shifted forward because his proposal had not been approved until the Dec. meeting and he was now planning to start in March with his three facilitated public meetings and that if they needed more of his time they should be prepared for that. He said that the Planning Commission was aware that it was a joint effort.
Mayor Leggett said the issue right then was to go ahead or did the Council want to delay and he asked was there any more questions.
Ms. Mitchell asked Mr. White if he would be available with ongoing advice.
Mr. White said that he would and that it was a twelve month process to get there from right then to the time to build anything and that the permit had to be approved and the plant designed approved and other permits such as a stream crossing permit had to be approved so they were not ready but just trying to get started.
Mayor Leggett asked if anyone wanted to make a motion.
Ms. Mitchell made the motion to accept WW & Associates’ proposal for the initial engineering of the wastewater collection and conveyance system of $131,000. Ms. Goodine seconded the motion and a roll call vote was taken and all Council members voted aye and the motion carried 7-0.
c). RESERVOIR UPDATE AND DON HEARL, ESS, PROPOSAL: Mayor Leggett said that the Town had gotten one bid which he felt was not responsive as the specifications called for a bolted steel tank and the bid was for a welded tank and that there were differences in the two especially with maintenance. He said one bid was not a satisfactory outcome and that the Council had a written explanation from Roger Cronin from Greely and Hansen and part of the problem was that the Town had been in a hurry and the thirty day period was over the holidays and it was also not a large job so a lot of potential bidders elected not to bid. He said he had discussed it with Don Hearl of ESS, who he felt had done such an excellent job running the bids for wastewater, and had gotten his input on what could be done with the Reservoir. He said that Don felt that he could guarantee three qualified bidders and that he would give them a little more time. Mayor Leggett said that the basic design put together by Greely and Hansen was fine and that it had been approved by the Health Dept. and that modifications could be made which could be done without going through the whole approval process. He said that he thought that they needed to re-bid and he had asked Mr. Hearl for a proposal. He commented that the cost of steel and the cost of concrete had gone up in the last three years and the basic question was did they build a steel tank for 200,000 gallons or a concrete tank for 200,000 gallons that required less maintenance because they might not want to be confined to a steel tank and that Mr. Hearl had offered to check that out too. He said that the concrete tank the Town had now was built in 1932 and was still working so it was a durable system.
Ms. Mitchell asked if Mr. Hearl was prepared to get started right away.
Mayor Leggett said that yes he was prepared to get the RFP done by the end of the month and get bids in by the end of February or the beginning of March.
Ms. Mitchell expressed her concerns that it was important to get started as soon possible because already the costs had gone up $200,000 since it was first started.
Ms. Mitchell made a motion to accept the ESS proposal (attached) to oversee the completion of the Reservoir. Mr. Benson seconded the motion and a roll call vote was taken and all Council members voted aye and the motion passed 7-0.
· NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED : b). XEROX COPIER PROPOSAL: Ms. Dodd discussed a proposal for a new Xerox copier lease agreement (attached) and asked the Council to consider a five year lease for a new copier with network and stapling options which would come to $152.76 a month. After a short discussion where the Council considered the new options and how they might be helpful with all the work that was going to be generated in rewriting the Comprehensive Plan and Historic District Ordinance, Mr. Benson made a motion to approve the lease for a new copier for $152.76 a month. Ms. Goodine seconded it and the motion passed 7-0.
c).
TRACTOR CANOPY:
Ms. Dodd discussed that Mr.
John McCarthy had asked that the
consider buying a tractor canopy for $345.00. The Council agreed that the canopy could be bought and authorized Ms. Dodd to proceed with the purchase.
· PUBLIC FORUM :
Mayor Leggett opened the Public Forum.
Ms. Ann Critizer asked the Council to consider a request by Mr. Critzer ( attached) to allow him to negotiate with General Berry to have a portion of the new reservoir road easement moved several feet so that an additional valve wold not have to be installed which would save the Town considerable maintenance in the long run.
Ms. Mitchell asked how the points could be relocated.
Mr. Bennett said by survey and also that General Berry would have to agree in principal to vacate the old portion of the easement and agree to the new and that it would also have to be adopted by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation on their part of the agreement.
Mr. Benson made a motion authorizing Steve and Ann Critzer to negotiate with General Berry for the relocation of a portion of the Reservoir Agreement in the name of the Town. Ms. Mitchell seconded it and a roll call vote was taken and all Council members voted aye and the motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Schwartz asked what was the best way to schedule the joint meetings with the Planning Commission and the Council.
Mayor Leggett said that if he wanted a regular meeting time that the second Monday of the month was usually a good day.
Mr. Schwartz said he would try to coordinate the joint meeting for the Comprehensive Plan review for the 2nd Monday and would publish it in the paper.
Ms. Mitchell commented that would be Feb. 14th , Valentine’s Day.
Ms. Goodine reminded everyone about the Martin Luther King celebration to be held on Sunday at the Theatre.
Ms. Mitchell said that it was an important event and that the Council would be recognized.
Ms. Dodd said she had gotten an email about it and would forward it to those Council members with email.
Ms. Mitchell said that John Norman had told her that he would like to buy the backhoe from the Town and that it had not been used since he had left.
Mayor Leggett closed the Public Forum.
· CLOSED MEETING : Ms. Mitchell made a motion to go into Closed Session pursuant to the provisions of Section 2-2-3.711A3 of the Code of Virginia for discussion or consideration of the acquisition or disposition of real property for public purpose where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the Town Council and 2) pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.23711a1 of the Code of Virginia for discussion and consultation about a personnel matter. Mr. Gobel seconded the motion and all were in favor.
· OPEN MEETING: Following the closed meeting, the Council reconvened at Mayor Leggett asked each member to certify that to the best of your knowledge:
Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meetings requirements under the Code of Virginia and,
Only, such public business matters as identified in the motion by which the motion by which the closed meeting was convened the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered by the Town Council. A roll call vote was taken and all members voted yes.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business to discuss Ms. Mitchell made a motion to adjourn, Mr. Goebel seconded it and the meeting adjourned at
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE COUNCIL:
Bank Summary Report
List of Bills-To-Be-Paid
Additional Bills Paid
Mr. Metcalf’s Water Tap Request
WW & Associates Engineering and Fee Proposal for Wastewater Collection and Conveyance System
ESS and Don Hearl’s Reservoir proposal
Xerox Copier Proposal
Letter from Steve Critzer
Respectfully submitted,
Eugene S. Leggett